<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What will donors do? Getting from the global to the personal.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lipmanhearnecommons.com/2009/02/what-will-donors-do-getting-from-the-global-to-the-personal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lipmanhearnecommons.com/2009/02/what-will-donors-do-getting-from-the-global-to-the-personal/</link>
	<description>Conversations for Visionary Organizations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 23:53:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen O'Grady</title>
		<link>http://www.lipmanhearnecommons.com/2009/02/what-will-donors-do-getting-from-the-global-to-the-personal/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen O'Grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lipmanhearnecommons.com/?p=158#comment-3</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great clarification (and a fun mental image). Community foundations lead the pack when it comes to communicating impact and demystifying the whole foundation ethos. And matching challenges are compelling. 
&lt;br /&gt;
(Truthfully, I have no squabble even with the most private of private foundations...my issue is more about year-end accounting methodologies. If I give $100 to a foundation or a federated giving campaign, and that agent turns around and gives my $100 to a homeless shelter, it &quot;looks&quot; like $200 was given that year.)
&lt;br /&gt;
This is where stories of impact begin to feel even more important--the general public needs to understand whether homelessness (for example) is being reduced, not just how much is being given to homelessness. Which is why I have high hopes for reporting like that found in one community foundation&#039;s regular Vital Signs feature:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cct.org/page10003377.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.cct.org/page10003377.cfm&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great clarification (and a fun mental image). Community foundations lead the pack when it comes to communicating impact and demystifying the whole foundation ethos. And matching challenges are compelling.<br />
<br />
(Truthfully, I have no squabble even with the most private of private foundations&#8230;my issue is more about year-end accounting methodologies. If I give $100 to a foundation or a federated giving campaign, and that agent turns around and gives my $100 to a homeless shelter, it &#8220;looks&#8221; like $200 was given that year.)<br />
<br />
This is where stories of impact begin to feel even more important&#8211;the general public needs to understand whether homelessness (for example) is being reduced, not just how much is being given to homelessness. Which is why I have high hopes for reporting like that found in one community foundation&#8217;s regular Vital Signs feature:<br />
<a href="http://www.cct.org/page10003377.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cct.org/page10003377.cfm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

